What is Real Problem AI?

Real Problem AI is a curated directory of 100 real problems worth building an AI startup around. Each problem is scored honestly on severity, AI feasibility, market signal, and competition gap. We're for builders looking for what to build, not for ethics debates about AI.

What is the difference between Real Problem AI and AI ethics or AI risks indexes?

Real Problem AI catalogues problems AI can solve — productive, commercial opportunities for builders. AI ethics indexes catalogue problems with AI itself (bias, environmental cost, copyright, consciousness). Different intent, different audience: founders and indie hackers vs researchers and policy folks.

What should I build with AI in 2026?

Look for problems with high severity (it costs people hours, sleep, or revenue every week), high AI feasibility (LLMs, vision or voice are great at this today), strong market signal (Reddit threads + willingness to pay), and a clear competition gap (incumbents miss the same obvious thing). Real Problem AI scores 100 such problems for you on those four axes.

Where do Real Problem AI's startup ideas come from?

From three sources, scanned each cycle: 1) Reddit threads where people describe a real friction in their own words, 2) podcasts and talks of founders young builders trust (Nikhil Kamath, Aman Gupta, Ankur Warikoo, Raj Shamani, Andrej Karpathy, Greg Isenberg), and 3) a continuous 1,000+ source scan covering forums, app store reviews, regulator filings, and field interviews.

Is Real Problem AI free?

Yes. Browsing every problem, opening every score breakdown, raising your hand on a co-founder match, and the founder vault are all free. There is no paywall.

How is each problem scored?

Four axes, each 1-10, weighted: Problem Severity (30%), AI Feasibility (25%), Market Signal (25%), Competition Gap (20%). Weighted average is the Opportunity Score on each card. Only problems clearing 7.0+ make the live list.

Why do Indian SaaS subscription businesses lose half their paying users to auto-debit?

Indian consumers actively resist automated monthly charges. Razorpay subscriptions auto-debit every month and 30%+ of UPI Autopay mandates fail at setup, so a 20k-signup SaaS keeps only ~1.2k of those willing to pay.

Category: FinTech · Trend: Voice / Agent · Opportunity score: 8.3 / 10

What is the “Why do Indian SaaS subscription businesses lose half their paying users to auto-debit?” problem in 2026?

Who has this problem?

Indian SaaS, OTT and DTC subscription businesses selling to retail consumers.

Recorded source context

Dataset source note: India is the hardest big market for subscription billing because Indian consumers actively resist automated monthly charges.

This note may summarize the referenced material rather than quote it verbatim. Source label: Nikhil Kamath × Ted Sarandos, People by WTF Ep. 10 (reference).

Existing players in this space

Razorpay Subscriptions: Auto-debit only; no per-use, family-shared or top-up patterns.
UPI Autopay: Banks reject 30%+ of mandates at setup.
Stripe Billing: US-first; no opinionated INR + UPI primitives.

What existing players are missing

A subscription billing primitive that does not feel like a subscription: per-use, family-shared, top-up wallet, with an opinionated retry+nudge ladder built for Indian consumer behaviour.

How Real Problem AI scores this opportunity

Aggregate score: 8.3 / 10. Four-axis rubric:

Problem severity: 8 / 10
AI feasibility today: 7 / 10
Market signal: 9 / 10
Competition gap: 7 / 10

How to build a solution: stack hints

UPI Autopay + e-mandate
Wallet primitives
Smart retry + WhatsApp nudge
Razorpay/Stripe adapters